The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Keith Doxey.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Beckoned by the dark side!


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Beckoned by the dark side!
  • From: "K. C. Li" <li@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 16:25:27 +0000 (GMT)
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Ant Skelton wrote:

> I'm extremely tempted by this also. What's the best IPAQ to go for for
> linux? And what's the procedure for the 'upgrade' (heh) ?

All current iPAQs are the same, despite the fact that Compaq assign two
model numbers to it (H3630 & H3650) depending on the marketing channel.
There is a whole website devoted to handhelds and Linux
(http://www.handhelds.org). There
you would find everything you need for
running Linux on the iPAQ. There are even discussions on using the iPAQ as
processing unit for a "wearable" computer.

> Linux IPAQ + PCMCIA + 802.11....Drool. ;)

Yes, except that the PC card jacket is almost as hard to find as the iPAQ
itself at the moment. A slightly better version would be iPAQ + CF +
802.11.

Regards,

Kwong Li
li@xxxxxxx
Laser Business Systems Ltd.
http://www.laser.com


-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
Create your business web site your way now at Bigstep.com.
It's the fast, easy way to get online, to promote your business,
and to sell your products and services. Try Bigstep.com now.
http://click.egroups.com/1/9183/3/_/2065/_/974651201/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->





Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.