RE: widescreen

[Keith Doxey <keith.doxey@xxxxxxx>]

I havent started on XML yet  but have got to for my current project at work

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Morgan [mailto:steve@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 01 December 2000 13:54
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] widescreen
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Doxey [mailto:keith.doxey@xxxxxxx]
>
> > <RANT MODE ON>
> > Not like all these "Shortscreen" TV's in the shops.
> > I am used to the height of the picture on my 4:3 28"
> Mitsubish and would
> > expect widescreen to be the same height but WIDER. Even a
> 32" WS set is an
> > inch shorter :-(
> > </RANT MODE OFF>
> > Keith
>
>
> Indeed. The very reason I waited until I could afford a 36"
> widescreen is
> because I didn't want a screen that was shorter than the 28" it
was to
> replace.
>
> I now have a Panasonic 36" Tau, which is nice.
>
> Steve
>
> P.S. Your XML is syntactically invalid.
>
> Can I suggest something like...
>
> <OPINION MODE="RANT">
>
> </OPINION>
>
> though Microsoft may have a BizTalk schema that offers an alternative.
>
> (Sorry, just got back from a .NET Developers Conference)
>
>
> -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor
> -------------------------~-~>
> eGroups eLerts
> It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/1/_/2065/_/975679032/
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------_->
>
>
>
>

-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/1/_/2065/_/975679589/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->