Re: RG6 vs CT100

["steve" <steve@xxxxxxx>]

Bollox!

A piece of wet string will conduct in any direction

Steve.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Bilboul" <Bilboul@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 2:41 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RG6 vs CT100


> NTL have now come back to me to say that CT100 is unidirectional and
with
> NTL's digital cable service they need to send data back up the cable
as
> opposed to, say Sky (satellite) digital which uses the telephone for
any
> feedback. As RG6 is bi-directional it is the recommended cable. If
only I
> knew when I installed CT100!!!
>
> Roger
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tracey.gardner [mailto:tracey.gardner@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 06:10
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: [ukha_d] RG6 vs CT100
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >> Agree with James.  Your CT100 is a higher quality cable
than RG6.
> > >
> >
> >
> > According to my catalogues the relative losses for RG6 and CT100
at
> > 400MHz are 13.1db and 13.0db respectively so there's very little
to
> > choose between them performance wise.
> >
> > Tracey
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>



-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/1/_/2065/_/975687549/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->