The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Urgent - Time to kill, want to build IR Extender


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: OT: Cheaper than usual 15" LCD


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: OT: Cheaper than usual 15" LCD
  • From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:39:31 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Paul,

I agree with you on both points.

I've come across LCDs, in projectors, which have 800x600 pixels, and claim
to support "1024x768 compressed." They look pants as well.

In any case, Insight are now out of stock ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Gordon [mailto:paul_gordon@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 02 October 2000 01:40
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT: Cheaper than usual 15" LCD


But surely the refresh rate for an LCD is pretty much irrelevant? - each
pixel is individually driven, - there is no raster scan involved, and the
refresh rate that is used as a measure for comparison of displays is the
refresh rate for a full raster field (IE one half of an interlaced frame)?
-
On an LCD, the entire display is drawn concurrently, not progressively. I
believe the problems referred to with fast motion blurring on LCD displays
is not "refresh rate" in the traditional sense, but more the
switching speed
of the individual transistors that drive each pixel? - Obviously I'm only
referring to TFT's here, not the older passive matrix displays which were
even worse in this respect...

Most 15" LCD's I have come across are all 1024x768 native resolution -
IE
that's the actual number of pixels that are built into the screen, and
whilst I have never even heard of one that can display higher resolution (I
fail to understand how that could be possible?) - I have seen plenty set to
lower resolutions, and without exception, they all look total pants. -
LCD's
only look any good when set to the actual resolution that the panel is
constructed with - anyhting else looks worse than the nastiest el-cheapo
screen you have ever seen!

£0.02

Paul G.


>1024x768 is an good resolution, especially for a 15" display,
problem with
>these TFTs (flatscreens) is that most of them you can only set the
refresh
>rate to 60hz, which is okay for graphics etc, but pretty poor for video
and
>especially animations.
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.







-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
Restaurants, Movies, Weather, Traffic & More!
Access Tellme from any phone.  For more info visit:
http://click.egroups.com/1/9534/9/_/2065/_/970483013/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->





Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.