RE: Lower Lower Price on DDAR

["Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>]

Purely out of Academic interest. I've got the kit and the ears to tell. I
thought you guys would be interested. If not then I won't bother.

Tim.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Miller [mailto:pmiller@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 02 April 2001 09:26
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Lower Lower Price on DDAR
>
>
> Your second observation came to mind straight away after I read Tims
> reply.
>
> Tim... is there any point in doing the test if you will not use MP3s
> anyway, even if (for example) there is negligible difference at 256K.
>
> What's the test for Tim?
>
> just a thought...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 02 April 2001 09:19
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Lower Lower Price on DDAR
>
>
> > Count me out - you know my feelings on mp3 :)
>
> But Tim....the DDAR plays straight .wav files too.  Personally the
> convience
> of the system has meant I've heard more of my music that I had done in
a
> long time.  Having instant access to all my 4000 tracks (and that's
> small by
> most peoples standards) is fab!
>
> > On a more serious note, I should be in a position to do the blind
test
> on
> > encoding rates later today. I've downloaded the LAME encoder. I
was
> > intending to use it with CDex 1.30, but have read elsewhere that
it is
> best
> > to rip the CD first. Is that the case or should I be OK with what
I've
> got.
>
> Hmmmm...seems from you statement above that you've already made your
> mind up
> you don't like MP3s before you start these tests.
>
> M.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>