The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Re: Cooling Node 0 (or your spare cupboard under the stairs!)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Home Highway... (compensation)


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Home Highway... (compensation)
  • From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:01:05 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Sounds like it's worth a try...
 
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Gareth Cook/STA/Lotus [mailto:gcook@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 23 April 2001 09:26
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: RE: [ukha_d] Home Highway... (compensation)


FYI

You are entitled to compensation for down time on your Home Highway - works out about £27 / day. You can only claim once the fault has been recitified.

I have mine installed in 99, and it was down for almost 4 weeks - my next bill (after I had asked for comensation - they won't just give it to you automatically) has a credit of over £450 - paid for it for 9 months.

So get on that phone !

G.
Gareth Cook
Senior Engineering Specialist

GeT IT Engineering,Networks,Security
IBM SWG, Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
Office:  +44 (0) 1784 445 166
Mobile:  +44 (0) 7980 445 166
Fax:      +44 (0) 1784 499 166
Work: gcook@xxxxxxx
Personal:
g@xxxxxxx
AOL AIM : theboyg
Pager : gpage.csc1@xxxxxxx


----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/STA/Lotus on 23/04/2001 09:25 -----
Discussion
Main Topic

"Phillip Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
Yesterday 17:48

.
Subject:
.
RE: [ukha_d] Home Highway...
.
Category:



Yeah ... OK Colin, I can see this as a way of protecting the users ego but
it doesn't help when paying an extortionate £40 a month for an archaic
64kbit service which doesn't work. Being told that nothing can be done
because it's a weekend and it's "probably an exchange fault - we can get an
engineer to look at it next week" does little more than annoy me. I bet
they'll be a damn sight quicker to complain if I send them three-quarters of
a months payment for what may turn out to be three-quarters of a months
service.

I'm not happy that I've been forced to go to Home Highway anyway but the
line quality out here "in the sticks" (in fact less than 2 miles outside
Winchester) is so bad that on a decent US Robotics 56k modem I was getting
1.7kbytes/sec average. To have to go to the expense of home highway to get
any sort of reasonable connect and transfer speed and then to have to resort
to digging out my old analogue modem just takes the biscuit.

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin Bradford [mailto:colin@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 22 April 2001 15:37
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Home Highway...
>
>
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Phillip Harris wrote:
>
> > About an hour ago I finally got through and reported the fault
> to the Home
> > Highway fault desk, I was asked by the guy on the desk (who's
> name I didn't
> > take a note of much to my distress) to unplug the cable between
> the ISDN TA
> > and the Home Highway wall box and swap it end to end as
> "sometimes you have
> > to let the signals go the other way down the cable"...
>
> Actually, I've asked people to do this. It's a polite way of saying
> "make sure you've got the cable plugged in the right connectors", and
> makes the user actually check. Normally, when you say "is it plugged
> in?" you get "of course, do you think I'm an idiot?" as the reply.
> Asking them to switch the cable round often clears the problem, without
> the user having to tell you that they've plugged it in wrong.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Colin.
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


------------------------
Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.