The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: No Yahoo Advert? (was RE: SWMBO Results!)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Digital Interconnect Review


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Digital Interconnect Review
  • From: "Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 09:34:49 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Thanks Alan.
 
Youve confirmed what I have always said.
 
For Analogue Audio, good screening is a must and low capacitance if you dont want to loose the higher frequencies. Or you can convert to a balanced signal and send it for long distances over two bits of wet string.....well not quite but any old twisted pair comms cable, even telephone cable. When we ran Coastal Radio at the local college there was a run of 100m of normal telephone cable from the studio to the refectory for an amp that we placed in there.
 
Even BiWiring is of limited but noticeable benefit. You are effectively just putting a much thicker cable to feed the speaker but as long as they are still being fed from the same amp you can still get cross modulation from heavy bass transients that will cause audible effects on the higher frequencies.
 
To gain the maximum benefit you need to Bi-Amp at least using an electronic crossover and separate amps for Low and High frequencies. Concert PA systems can be split into as many as 5 separate bands. Sub Bass, Bass, LowMid, HighMid and Treble.
 
This allows you to use beefy amps for the bass and more sublte amplification for the more delecate parts of the audio spectrum. It also means that you havent got an amp rated a several hundred watts that could burn out tweeters that may only be rated at 25W. In discos that dont use a Multiamp configuratiuon there was a rash of destroyed horns when "Rave" appeared on the scene as the makeup of the music was totally different. There were segments where the only audio was very high frequency treble and if the DJ turned the mixer up high, apart from being painful on the ears, the 500W amp would kill the 50W horn in a matter of seconds. :-((
 
When I get time I will send Tim a set of KAT5 modules to try on his Plasma screen. I would be interested to find out what he thinks of the quality. Mark Harrison was suitable impressed with the Audio performance and I know what others think of the video performance. I would also be interested to find out how much Tims Component Video lead set cost. Probably more than my TV !!!
 
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Cockerton [mailto:alancc@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 03 August 2001 23:15
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: [ukha_d] Digital Interconnect Review

Well we done a review tonight of digital interconnects, I was unable to get a Siltech lead as suggested by Tim so we made do with the following kit.
 
QED QUNEX SR75 £60.00
QED QUNEX P75 £25.00 (my lead)
TDK cheapo audio interconnect FREE
 
The results, they all sounded the same, even the cheapo lead. We honestly could not pick out any noticeable difference.
 
Whilst I would not disagree that good quality interconnects for analogue signals are a must, I cannot say the same for digital.
 
The biggest improvement I found with my setup was bi wiring the speakers and using the 10P, it made a vast difference.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.