[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: (Mark ?)
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: (Mark ?)
- From: "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 23:42:58 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geraint@xxxxxxx [mailto:geraint@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 August 2001 23:25
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: (Mark ?)
>
>
> Suits me just fine !
>
> I know a good optician, if you are unable to read mail becuase it has
> extra commas in it. (of course, thats if you bother to read it !)
>
> I'm going to bite my tongue with what I would really like to say.
So am I.
>
> Quite sad that you have nothing better to do than check on gramatical
> errors in e-mail.
> I would have thought the content of mail would be more important, but
> I guess not.
>
I really couldn't give a fuck about your grammar, if I did, then I would
never be able to read any public forum on the Internet, all I ask is that
you make your posts easier to read.
> But of course I don't object to opinion, even ones as extreme as this.
> It's a shame that the only times I see mail from you is when it is
> critical about someone else's findings or ideas, especially when they
> do not follow your own interpretations.
Really? After Alan tried what I suggested I posted a follow-up. Firstly I
made some suggestions about repeating the test with slightly different
equipment, and secondly I admitted that maybe I was wrong the first time,
and that I would repeat the same test again at a later time. In fact I'm
going to get hold of an HF-8, which is very highly regarded, and get Phil
Harris to come round, and with a bit of luck the cable supplier too. I've
been a member of this list for several years now, and have done more than
my
fair share of helping.
>
> This group has been more than friendly and on many occasions people
> on here have got me a fix to a problem very quickly.
> It's a shame you cannot therefore participate in the spirit of what
> these groups are about instead of putting someone down.
I can. All I did was ask that you make your posts easier to read, and you
responded further down the thread with snide comments - which always seems
to be the way when people who are too lazy to write reasonably formatted
English are criticised. I realise that not everyone is a genius when it
comes to English, but it isn't that difficult to take just a little more
care over what you write to make it easier for others to read.
>
> I apologise now to the group if they don't like me using multiple
> commas, fullstops, spelling or any other gramatical errors, but I do
> have better things to do then check my typing when asking a quick
> question or just replying to such like.
>
But you're obviously not too busy to make snide comments. All I did was ask
you to lay off on the commas.
Tim.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|