The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Wireless security


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: LD module mounting


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Re: LD module mounting
  • From: "Paul Gordon" <paul_gordon@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 15:37:10 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

>
>If I remember, as i'm doing this at the moment.
>
>the AD10 is equivalent of 2 mcb's in width
>the LD10 is equivalent of 3 mcb's in width.

Excellent info - just what I needed. - thanks!

>
>As others have pointed out, it is worthwhile leaving a spacer gap
>between two modules together as in :
>
>space - module - module - space.
>
>This is becuase the LD10 can get quite hot and if it cannot vent it
>tends to stop working.
>I've not had one fail on me yet, but I do know they do get warm when
>dimming.


OK, makes sense, - I presume that only the LD10/11 is prone to heating due
to the dimming function?

In which case, is there an argument for alternating AD's & LD's, so
that two
(or more) LD's are not adjacent to each other?



>I actually use 20way flushmount metal MK consumer units.
>I have 4 in node 0, plan that they will cover the main house as it is
>at the moment. If I do add an extension, then i'll add others then. I
>have created the node 0 design so that either 2 or 4 more units can
>go in.
>

This is *just* for the master bedroom lights, although I suppose some
expansion space for a couple of other units would never be a >bad<
idea!

Cheers.

Paul G.


_________________________________________________________________

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.