[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
BIK sensor - WAS moving away from the remote-control paradigm
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: BIK sensor - WAS moving away from the remote-control
paradigm
- From: "Ian B" <Ian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 08:22:21 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> 1) They are not here! - they are just vapourware at the moment...
They are closer than you think. I have three of the originals and made
Stuart the PCB for his soldering practice. As Stuart said he is 95% there.
> 2) I >believe< their effectiveness is dependant on having loads
of aerials
There are two aerials that are best sited at about three feet high. These
can even be the tin foil burglar strip you see stuck to windows in shops
etc. - great behind wall paper or even thick paint. Furniture moving like
chairs, tables etc. doesn't necessitate a recalibration but large metal
objects can e.g. fridge freezers might. More than one unit can be used in a
room without problems which is good as they are more accurate with less
area
covered. A good house earth is the only thing that is not really obvious
but
essential.
> 3) even if both of the above are solved, - there is no demonstrable
proof
> that they will work, so until I've seen one in operation, and it's
been
> demonstrated to work, then I'll reserve judgement, and not get my
> hopes up too high...
I have had one working at home in a test environment and it was brill. I
ran
into sensitivity problems when I went for a large room 14' X 18' and L
shaped. The answer is two sensors and sort out my house earth which is
awful!!
HTH
Ian
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|