[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: wireless kit for epod and ipaq whats the best?
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: wireless kit for epod and ipaq whats the
best?
- From: "Mick Furlong" <dorsai@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:53:17 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Craig
I will sort of like that, not as configurable as port forwarding but I like
the idea of using one PC as the outward face to the world and of course
that
PC could run ZoneAlarm or similar so it wouldn't be totally exposed.
You have given me some food for thought. hmmm if it was a win2000 box with
two NICs I guess it could route connections for the other PCs on the
network
if they really needed it. I will need to do some more thinking!
Cheers
Mick
Craig Callander <craig@xxxxxxx> said:
> Mick, one more thing, I saw this in the FAQ:
>
> 5. What is DMZ? And how many DMZ computers does the Barricade support?
> Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) is a feature of firewall. It allows a set of
> computers to be exposed to the Internet. Some applications require
multiple
> TCP/IP ports to be open. DMZ allows computers to be exposed for that
> purpose. The Barricade supports one DMZ computer if you enable the
feature.
>
> This may help your 'underlying motive' , if all your non-NAT friendy
apps
> are on one PC?
>
> Craig
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mick Furlong [mailto:dorsai@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:13 PM
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] wireless kit for epod and ipaq whats the best?
>
>
> Craig
>
> sounds good although it would be nice to have a single box that did
all
> these
> things and supported port forwarding. This would give the best of all
> worlds.
>
> Just a question though are you sure it can be used in the way you
suggest?
>
> I have briefly scanned the user guide and it seems to assume it is
working
> in
> NAT mode at all times, if it is and if it is allocating your PCs IP
> addresses
> in the private range then I don't think it is going to be too happy
> coexisting with either an ethernet NAT or non-NAT ADSL connection.
>
> All of the above could be garbage btw ;) and I have a underlying
motive in
> that I want to run a NAT hardware based firewall (with configurable
port
> forwarding) and a wireless network. When I first looked at this I had
hoped
> it would do both.
>
> Cheers
> Mick
>
> Craig Callander <craig@xxxxxxx> said:
>
> > If you dont want to use the firewall/NAT features, just connect
your
> > broadband connection to the 'home' side. Then use your favourite
s/w
> > firewall solution to protect your PC's.
> >
> > My recommendation was based on features, price and the fact the
SMC
> devices
> > work on epods, 249.00 GBP for barricade + FREE pcmcia card.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mick Furlong [mailto:dorsai@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:05 PM
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] wireless kit for epod and ipaq whats the
best?
> >
> >
> > Just a little problem with the SMC barricade broadband, if I am
reading
> this
> >
> > correctly it uses NAT, this means that certain things will not
work on
> > the 'home' side of the router.
> >
> > Among these are netmeeting, mirc dcc send, ftp servers and
webservers (I
> > think it also screws some games).
> >
> > As far as I can tell there is no way to either turn this off or
use port
> > forwarding to circumvent it.
> >
> > The thing that really bugs me is they are selling it as a
firewall feature
>
> > and advertising it as a plus point! If you want to do any of the
above
> > things
> > then you will need to connect the PC/PCs doing them before this
device
> > (which
> > means you cannot do them over wireless).
> >
> > Fine for people who want to do nothing much but send email and
browse the
> > web
> > but how many of them will be broadband users?
> >
> > Mick
> >
> > Craig Callander <craig@xxxxxxx> said:
> >
> > > John
> > >
> > > You could use the SMC wireless cards, these are known to
work with the
> > > epods. SMC have an offer on until the end of the month, if
you buy a
> > > barricade wireless broadband router you can claim a free
pcmcia card,
> see
> > > www.smc.com
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dr John Tankard [mailto:john@xxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:41 AM
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [ukha_d] wireless kit for epod and ipaq whats the
best?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I want to get some wireless kit for a ipaq and my epod, I
want the base
> > > station to just plug into a switch rather than another slot
used up in
> my
> > > server. What should I go for ?
> > >
> > > IIRC the epod is a bit fussy on rf stuff
> > >
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > <http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>
> > > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > >
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > <http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>
> > > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >
> >
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=210156.1528652.3092242.1456760/D=egroupweb/S=17050419
> >
> 92:HM/A=734183/R=0/*https://www.joincountryhomesandgardens.com/mybookclub/ga
> >
>
rdening/bookclubs/chg/JoinFast/c2/c2_coupon.htm/?src=015_02_hd_273_139_1410>
> >
> >
> >
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=210156.1528652.3092242.1456760/D=egroupmai
> > l/S=1705041992:HM/A=734183/rand=831297974>
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > <http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>
> > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
Service.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
--
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|