[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternative to DDAR?
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Alternative to DDAR?
- From: "Dan James" <UKHA@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:57:54 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Well I may have to investigate that route.....
Only in the US though :-( so would have to bounce it to a US address
first.. (does anyone know if mexico counts as a US address? - I know
there is no sales tax involved).
Daniel
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@e...>
wrote:
> The RIO-badged version is indeed still available, and retails for
US$
> 300 from them direct...
>
> Mark Harrison
> Head of Systems, eKingfisher
>
>
**********************************************************************
**
> ****
> Kingfisher plc
> Registered Office: North West House, 119 Marylebone Road, London
NW1 5PX
> Registered in England, Number 1664812
>
> This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is
addressed
> and
> may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the
contrary,
> any
> opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not
represent the
> official view of the company. If you have received this e-mail in
> error,
> please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this
> message
> from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any
purposes, or
> disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your
> co-operation.
>
**********************************************************************
**
> ****
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx...]
> Sent: 24 August 2001 09:13
> To: ukha_d@y...
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Alternative to DDAR?
>
>
>
> My understanding is that you can no longer get the DEL version
however
> RIO
> make the DDAR in the first place and DELL just rebadged it...
>
> Phil
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan James [mailto:UKHA@xxxxxxx...]
> > Sent: 24 August 2001 09:05
> > To: ukha_d@y...
> > Subject: [ukha_d] Alternative to DDAR?
> >
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > I finally managed to persuade SWMBO that MP3 is the route to go
> > rather than a CD jukebox.... SO my next hurdle is to make it
SWMBO
> > friendly.....
> >
> > From reading the many postings I gather you can no longer get
hold of
> > the DDAR? :-( (in the UK or the States?)
> >
> > On this basis is their an alternative available on the market?
and
> > does anyone know where these may be available from?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > Post message: ukha_d@y...
> > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@y...
> > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@y...
> > List owner: ukha_d-owner@y...
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@y...
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@y...
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@y...
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@y...
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
_____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
> http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|