RE: DDAR - Ooo - Linux Gurus required!!!!!

["Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>]

So does this mean that someone could patch in a "sort by Artist and
then by
Album" option?

*grin*

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Broadfoot, Kieran J [mailto:Kieran.Broadfoot@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 28 August 2001 09:33
> To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] DDAR - Ooo - Linux Gurus required!!!!!
>
>
> For what its worth I have the toolchain built so I can recompile the
ddar
> kernel and associated tools.  However(!) I havent even switched mine
on
> since I got it last wednesday due to moving flats etc.  So if I can
get
> myself sorted and actually plug the thing in then I might start
fiddling
> around.   For those of you talking about setting up a remote
> control of the
> device from your PC the web server runs on the PC on port 81 to which
the
> receiver connects to.  Im not sure how useful this would be given the
> receiver initiates the request.
>
> I was thinking it would be interesting (if possible) to compile
> up a simple
> inetd and shell for the device so you can connect to the machine
> and control
> it.  Alternatively a tiny web server local to the box might also be a
> possibility.  In all these cases the player software is closed source
> whereas the kernel (linux) is open source.  Creating a working remote
> control app for this device is probably a: a lot of work and b: likely
to
> lose you some functionality as well.  As Mr Harrison sez maybe we
should
> just keep it as a consumer electrical device ;-)
>
> Apologies to all those who are starting to worry that this is
> turning out to
> be another epods list ;-)
>
> k.
>
> p/s anyone fancy building one of the console cables at:
> http://www.mock.com/receiver/server/
(bottom of page)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Oliver [mailto:ioliver.lists@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:06 AM
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] DDAR - Ooo - Linux Gurus required!!!!!
>
>
> In article <200108272029570280.06429DCB@xxxxxxx>, Andy
Powell wrote:
> > I guess not may people have looked in the Licence folder?? I mean
surely
> if someone
> had looked we'd be hearing all about it wouldn't we???
>
> Yes, I had a quick snoop and intend to have a longer one. But the
> last thing
> I need is
> *another* project!
>
> Regards
>
> Ian Oliver
> Sunny Leeds, UK
> Using Java on Tini for control via Dallas 1-wire
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>