[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Small PBX Required
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Small PBX Required
- From: "Mick Furlong" <dorsai@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 17:32:13 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
OK let me summarise...
Expensive
Ugly
Sounds like just what I want ;)not
Thanks for the pointer Ant but I was after more of a hardwired solution
that
will let me use existing phones and possibly dect as an add on although I
am
really not that bothered about Dect, as a matter of interest what does the
Airway cost?
Cheers
Mick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ant skelton [mailto:ant@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 12 December 2001 16:51
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Small PBX Required
>
>
> On Wednesday 12 December 2001 16:41, you wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have any idea where I could pick up a small pbx
> (2-4 analogue
> > lines and 4-8 extensions) it would be nice if it could pass CLI
to the
> > extensions but that isn't essential.
> >
> > Above all it needs to be smallish (or rackmount)and going cheap
;)
>
> I have one of these: http://www.bt.com/airway
>
> It's 4 line DECT, does CLI too. It's small, not rack mountable, and
not
> particularly cheap. Oh, and the handsets are ugly.
>
> ant
> --
> ant@xxxxxxx /\/\ www.ant.org
> (`')
> ()
> Megawatt Winged Avenger
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|