RE: Domain Names (again)

["Des Gibbons" <des@xxxxxxx>]

d8.co.uk is fine
db.co.uk is not

any clearer? :)

DesG

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pmiller@xxxxxxx [mailto:pmiller@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 02 February 2001 16:02
> To: des@xxxxxxx; ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Domain Names (again)
>
>
> you've lost me, I'm afraid
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Des Gibbons [mailto:des@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 02 February 2001 15:49
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Domain Names (again)
>
>
> Didn't really make that clear, 2 character names are allowed, 2
> letter names
> are not :)
>
> Unless you are BT of course :p
>
> DesG
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Des Gibbons [mailto:des@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 02 February 2001 15:40
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Domain Names (again)
> >
> >
> > >From Nominets rules page :-
> >
> > Two character names are allowed. i.e. 3x.co.uk where the format
is not
> > aa.foo.uk.
> >
> > DesG
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Benfield [mailto:john.benfield@xxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 02 February 2001 15:26
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [ukha_d] Domain Names (again)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Aaaaarrrgggh ... It's not fair. Why can't I have a two
character
> > > domain name. If British Telecom can have www.bt.co.uk why
can't I
> > > do it (nothing to do with the fact they make millions
(billions)
> > > of pounds and run half the network of course).
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > John Benfield
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged
> > > information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have
> > > received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender
> > > immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised
copying,
> > > disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is
> > > strictly forbidden.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>