[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: URGENT : Ideas Wanted
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: URGENT : Ideas Wanted
- From: "Doogie Brodie" <dbrodie@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 16:53:53 +0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I said that first....!!!
- -- -[Doogie Brodie]- -- -
- -- -[Senior Developer]- -- -
Total Repair Solutions UK
e dbrodie@xxxxxxx
m +44.705.006.9.007
t +44.141.951.1903
f +44.141.951.1588
>>> "Michael Mc Aree" <michael.mcaree@xxxxxxx>
08/01/2001 16:49:06 >>>
Does it have to be invasive biometric? Why not use one of those smell
devices as I'm sure we all have our own unique smell/odour. If they can
have
a machine which can sniff wine then why not to identify members of your
family :-)
Michael
BELFAST
-----Original Message-----
From: Doogie Brodie [mailto:dbrodie@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 08 January 2001 16:40
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] URGENT : Ideas Wanted
<SNIP>
-------->>>>>>>>_____The other option which
wouldn't involve implanting would be to use smell
detection. I've heard various things about it being quite accurate etc, but
am not sure about the sensor to subject range that it supports. Erm... some
sort of voice print could also be used, but that would involve a query/
response cycle instead of the passive detection of implant or
smell.__________
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|