RE: Pront or Marantz again

["James, Daniel" <daniel.james@xxxxxxx>]

Not sure on the Marantz front.

 

The memory storage space is the only difference.... the 2mb one will allow you t store a much bigger ccf, if you wanted t store lots of graphics in your configs or all the tracks on your jukebox

 

I have replaced 8 remotes with my 1mb pront and still have 70% memory free.

 

Regards

 

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave McLaughlin [mailto:dave@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 13 July 2001 11:57
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: [ukha_d] Pront or Marantz again

Hi All,

I got a lot of good replies from my last post.

From it I gather most of you use the Pront . Does anyone use the Marantz
version and if so, can you use the Pront CCF files with it directly?

Also, is the Pront 2Mb machine worth getting, ie, is it faster, more
features or is the standard 1Mb machine perfect for normal use? I only need
t replace about 4 remotes at present.

Regards
Dave...





____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

***********************************************************
This message is confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s) only and remains the property of 
Exchange FS Group plc. You should not disclose its contents 
t  any other person. If you are not the intended recipient 
please notify the sender named above immediately.

Registered Office: Munro House, Portsmouth Road, Cobham, 
Surrey, KT11 1TE. Registered in England N . 2596452
***********************************************************



____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t  the Yahoo! Terms of Service.