[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: OT: Mobile Phone Masts
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: OT: Mobile Phone Masts
- From: "Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 00:20:12 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
The transmitters radiate outwards not downwards and are VERY directional
which is why there are aerials pointing in all directions. Total combined
RF
power is quite high.
There is a site on the roof of Bishops Stortford Telephone Exchange which
had t be shut down whilst a leaking roof was repaired after the
contractors
complained of feeling unwell.
Signal strength several hundred metres away would be well dispersed but you
wouldnt want t be directly inline with the transmitter at close range
unless you like having your internal organs microwaved !!!
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Lowe [mailto:ian@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 July 2001 12:04
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] OT: Mobile Phone Masts
This always gets me: it's a physics fundamental isn't it? Radiated field
strength is inversely proportional t distance from emmiter..
The power going each way in a mobile phone call must be about the same.
Sure
the base station has much bigger antennae but still, they can't be pumping
out more than five or six times what a handset does...
And yet people think the masts are a terrible health risk, but clamp a
phone
flat a against the side of their head.....
I can see a pile of transmitters a few hundred metres away on the hilltop.
They bother me a lot less than the handset itself does!
or have I, again, got my physics all skewwiff?
Ian.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Mc Aree" <michael.mcaree@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 11:51 AM
Subject: [ukha_d] OT: Mobile Phone Masts
> You techy people may know, buy why can't they put masts on top of
> Electricity Pylons? Benefits are that they can be quite high and can
have
no
> complaints from the fools who live under them, as opposed t on the
roof
of
> a two story building with the local community going nuts about it!
>
> Michael
> BELFAST
>
>
> ###############################################
> This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received
> it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose
> the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of
> this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the
> company, unless specifically stated.
> #################################################
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Automated Home UK
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> ____________________________________
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|