[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Project] Kbd/LCD device
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Project] Kbd/LCD device
- From: patrickl@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 16:05:48 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Broadfoot, Kieran J"
<Kieran.Broadfoot@g...>
wrote:
> I agree a simple socket based network protocol is more than
adequate. Do we
> need the complexity of IM or IRC though?
Both solve the naming problems which would require manual maintenance
of a DNS server or a rogered DHCP server to solve otherwise.
> Take a look at smtp or ftp for
> instance. The handshaking and comms is very simple and pretty much
as much
> complexity as we need.
Agreed. The FTP model is also interesting - maybe we'll have a use
for control channel + data at some point.
Patrick
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|