Re: Suggestions for methodology...

["Andrew Woolass" <andrew@xxxxxxx>]

you won it

It worked for me

A


----- Original Message -----
From: Phil Harris <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: 18 June 2001 20:19
Subject: [ukha_d] Suggestions for methodology...


>
> Allow me to place with you the following mathematical problem:
>
> Let "A" = "Phil been made redundant three days
ago",
> Let "B" = "Missus is downstairs",
> Let "C" = "Missus is aware of 'A'".
>
> Currently A, B and C are in equilibrium therefore we have state
"D" where
> state "D" is defined as "All is calm"
>
> If we now add the following:
>
> Let "E" = "Another split A/C unit secreted in the boot
of the car",
> Let "F" = "The missus hates the size of the one I have
already",
> Let "G" = "It was only £199 - Bargain!"
>
> I don't think we'll have equilibrium any more.
>
> Can anyone suggest how I can spin this one without leaving the A/C in
the
> boot of the car and hoping that I never have to open it whilst she's
around?
> (Not likely since we're taking the demon spawn to the seaside next
weekend!)
>
> HEEEEEELP!
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Automated Home UK
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> ____________________________________
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>




____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/