[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Bathroom pullswitch to X10 compatible
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Bathroom pullswitch to X10 compatible
- From: adrian.lucas@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:01:15 +0200
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
ok - I understand now. I hadn't realised that your suggestion was in
addition to the mod. Apologies.
Adrian Lucas
ukha.diyha@xxxxxxx on 27/03/2001 14:47:11
Please respond to ukha_d@xxxxxxx@SMTP
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx@SMTP
cc:
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Bathroom pullswitch to X10 compatible
Classification:
That would be me.
I said use a 2 way switch.
That followed a message describing how to "break" the latching
cation so it
always returned to one state.
The point of a 2 way switch was that you didnt know if you would break it
to
be normally on or normally off.
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: adrian.lucas@xxxxxxx [mailto:adrian.lucas@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 14:46
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Bathroom pullswitch to X10 compatible
Somebody mentioned using a change over switch instead of an on/off switch.
I can't see how
this would solve the problem which requires a momentary switch. Using
common and one
terminal of a change over is equivalent to an on/off!
Adrian Lucas
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|