The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Re: Touchscreen Door Lock


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 802.11b Wireless Kit


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: 802.11b Wireless Kit
  • From: patrickl@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:43:22 -0000
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

--- In ukha_d@y..., "Henderson, Darren"
<Darren.Henderson@b...> wrote:
> Just noticed on Dabs site (I have no connection with them)
>=20
> They are selling the new Netgear Wireless Starter Kit (Access Point=20
and one
> PCCard) for =A3249 + Vat (=A3292)
>=20
> Seems cheap to me, no mention of WiFi compliance tho.
>=20

I know from my own bitter experience that WiFi compliance doesn't=20
count for much. It seems that the standard doesn't extend to include=20
the generation of the key that is used for encryption. Normally this=20
requires the user to enter a pass phrase or pin code in an admin gui=20
which is then used to seed the generation of the key. So there is a=20
chance that you won't be able to generate the same encryption key on=20
two different vendors WiFi compliant kit, in which case the cards=20
will associate, but pass only gobbledygook. If you are lucky, the=20
vendor will provide access to the raw hex encryption key in the GUI,=20
in which case you can enter it manually and you'll ok.
This isn't important if your access point allows you to turn off=20
encryption (the Orinoco doesn't), or if you don't care about=20
encryption...

Patrick


=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.