[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: Action Pack
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: Action Pack
- From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:04:18 +0100
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I'm not saying you shouldn't get it. I'm just saying that you should be
aware that it's as legal as a pirated copy if you're not a
consultancy/solutions provider specialising in MS solutions.
Tim - you may find that you are legal, assuming that some of your
friends, say, buy you a pint once a year, and you declared that as a
"benefit in kind" on your tax return. The tax on a pint would be
less
than =A31, and therefore not charged unless you had other benefits to
round up into...
Mark Harrison
Head of Systems, eKingfisher
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Powell [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 23 October 2001 09:58
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Action Pack
=20
> The Action Pack licence quite clearly states that it is issued on=20
the
> basis of supplied information being accurate, and is for companies=20
who
> derive greater than 75% of their income through Microsoft=20
Consultancy or
> delivering Software Solutoins on a Microsoft Platform.
Income =3D 0
100% of Income =3D 0
;-)
Andy
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|