RE: Re: OT: Terrorism

["Mick Furlong" <dorsai@xxxxxxx>]

Mark

np I don't feel slighted I just don't agree with you on this :)

Mick



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Hetherington (egroups)
> [mailto:mark.egroups@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 12 September 2001 22:48
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: OT: Terrorism
>
>
> > > > I still think totally secure flight decks is a
'reasonable'
> > solution and
> > > > doesn't suffer from hacking or any other kind of
outside
> interference.
> > >
> > > There is no such thing as totally secure. Any link that
allowed
> > control of
> > > the plane from the ground is susceptible to being hacked and
can be
> > > interefered with. I do not see it "solving"
anything, it
> merely creates
> > > problems.
> >
> > If you read my email properly you will see that at no point do
> I recommend
> > any control from the ground I merely suggest securing the flight
deck.
>
> I did read it "properly" and although you didn't
specifically mention it
> yourself you quoted messages discussing this so it was not an
unreasonable
> place for my comment. I did miss changing paragraph however. I
> apologise if
> you felt slighted by my comment.
>
> I discuss locked doors further in another reply so forgive me for not
> addressing your points directly. I think they are all covered in my
other
> email.
>
>
> Mark.
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>