RE: Autoroute 2002

["Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>]

I've found it to be quite reasonable in use ... generally when I have the
GPS receiver hooked up it's accurate enough to show which side of a
motorway
you're on which is - what - accurate to 30ft or so.

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Challis [mailto:richard@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 23 September 2001 18:04
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Autoroute 2002
>
>
> I hope they've improved the maths behind it! When using British grid
ref's
> taken from 10,000 scale maps there can be a great difference in where
it
> thinks I should be and where I ought to be.....
>
> Perhaps I'm being cruel or wanting too much bang for my bucks,
considering
> how much accurate map data costs. You wouldn't want it to be too
> accurate.....
>
> Regards
>
>     Rich
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
> To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 5:38 PM
> Subject: [ukha_d] Autoroute 2002
>
>
> >
> > Does anyone know what the "improvements" are between
Autoroute 2001 and
> > 2002? I bought 2001 and am very happy with it ... I assume the
maps will
> be
> > more up to date (the A34 Newbury bypass has only been open 3
years but
> it's
> > not in the 2001 mapping!) but has there been any improvement in
> > functionality for the 2002 version?
> >
> > Phil
> >
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>