[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Enough CAT5?
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Enough CAT5?
- From: "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:51:11 +0100
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
That's the point that I missed entirely from my argument. If I wanted to
flood wire my house with CAT5 it would cost thousands, rather than hundreds
of pounds.
Tim.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 28 September 2001 14:55
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Enough CAT5?
>
>
> Tim,
>
> Agreed.
>
> However, if you are building / seriously renovating, then the marginal
> cost of adding lots of flood-wiring is low, and therefore, in my view,
> it would be worth doing.
>
> I still haven't, however, flood-wired my house with CAT5 ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Mark Harrison
> Head of Systems, eKingfisher
>
>
>
> The new WLAN technologies will be 100Mb+, and due next year. Windows
XP
> supports RADIUS for both wired and wireless network security which
> encrypts every packet at the OS level so there's no need for the cards
> themselves to offer it (It is like running a VPN on your local
network).
>
> If the Marantz RC-5200 (?) has sufficient range, then IR distribution
is
> taken care of.
>
> I already have curtain control through X10.
>
> I realise that in order to do it today you need CAT5, but I don't
think
> it will be necessary in a couple of years.
>
> Just an opinion....
>
> Tim.
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|