RE: Cat5 alternative to coax?

["Des Gibbons" <des@xxxxxxx>]

Cat5 doesn't have the capacity to do that, if you want coax features (
and<=
BR>
quality) use coax.

Des
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerard McGovern [mailto:stuff@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 01:22
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Cat5 alternative to coax?
>
>
> Afternoon,
>
> Is there Cat5 alternative to coax cable? The beauty of coax is that
yo=
u
> can effectively broadcast down it, therefore having multiple
channels.=
> Keith's KAT5 system is all well and good, but unless I am mistaken,
it=
> can only broadcast one channel/source?
>
> Is there a system, that works over Cat5, that could broadcast BBC,
ITV=
,
> Sky et al?
>
> TIA,
>
> G
>
> --
>
>   =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =
=BA =95
>   Gerard McGovern
>   Webmonkey to the stars
>
>     gerard@xxxxxxx
>     http://www.=
inkiboo.com
>
>   =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =
=BA =95
>
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http:=
//www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Yahoo! Groups Spons= or

ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www=
.automatedhome.co.uk 
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.