|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: radio automation |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: ADSL vs Cable
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: ADSL vs Cable
- From: "andy_powell_is" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:49:41 -0000
- Delivered-to: ukha_archive@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Andy Laurence" <andy@a...> wrote:
> Why are decisions never easy? I thought I'd go over to ADSL when
i
move, as
> they don't cut you off for running a web server (yes, it's happened
to
> friends on BlueYonder). Unfortunately, I need a BT line to do
this
(as I
Andy,
The simplest way around this is to run your servers on non standard,
high ports http on port 5060 for example, you can always use a
freebie website to do a redirect if you want. Don't set up a site
that has 1000's of people hitting on it (MP3 downloads etc). Cable
cos tend to scan ports but they usually stick below 1024 (I don't
think they even go that high). I actually run a mail server but only
collect all my mail (from various accounts) using it and, when I
send, to talk direct to the recipiants SMTP server.
If you select cable do not expect to be happily running servers on
standard ports. To be honest unless you want to run a public
webserver go for cable. You can quite happily run a webserver for
your HA stuff on a different port because (I'd guess) very few people
would be allowed access to it. Personally I use the services of Mr
Keay for my public website(s) - he's a top chap.. (shame he's ugly
tho ; )
Andy
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|