[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: NEW ukha project
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: NEW ukha project
- From: "Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 12:37:39 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
There is code on the net for using PIC's with one wire devices. I am
certain
the techniques would be the same.
http://www.phanderson.com/PIC/index.html
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: ray.barnett [mailto:ray.barnett@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 15 February 2002 11:44
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: NEW ukha project
Ooh. Now that does sound exciting. Is there any way of interfacing a
one-wire bus with the Rabbit using an extra chip or two? The Rabbit would
do
everything I need for the home environment then, although I still like the
extra memory available on the TINI.
Ray.
----- Original Message -----
One of the most exciting options which opens up with a full TCP/IP
stack is the option to use multicast or broadcast. Every device on
....
installation/use). Of course, such a scheme can run in parallel with
HTTP/XML style interfaces, so you can have your cake and eat it ;-)
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|