[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: X10 addressing
Thanks
Mark & Keith for the suggestions, they sound like
sensible options.
I
wasn't sure if I should split lights & applicance onto separate address
lines....
> --- I _don't_ use unit code 1, because this
"clunks" the relay in the > TM module, which is both the
RF
receiver from these PIRs _and_ an > appliance
module
Do you just mean you don't like the noice, or do you mean that
it
screws things up a bit?
While we're onthe subject - is the CM11 also an applicance
module?
I can't see anything to suggest it is/tell me how to change the address,
but it
seems a bit silly if it isn't!
cheers,
Tony
********************************************************************
Visit our Internet site at http://www.rbsmarkets.com
This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to
retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
********************************************************************
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|