[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Wandsworth switch pics up
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Wandsworth switch pics up
- From: "Kenneth Watt" <kennwatt@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:29:55 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 19 February 2002 17:43
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Wandsworth switch pics up
>
>
> > > No, the reason for knowing this is what exactly? All I want
> > > is lights to go brighter or dimmer and I don't much care how
> > > it's done but the "slow" makes it kina jerky as in
a delay
> > > between each dim command, therefore IMO it looks terrible
;-)
> >
> > The reason being that these use relative dims (i.e. were
> > intended for the "dumb" lamp modules) rather than
absolute
> > dims and so you may get out of step IIRC...
>
> By the way ... I agree "slow" does look sh*te!
>
[Kenneth Watt]
Now if we could get it to dim slowly and progressively then that would
be good and impressive in certain situations.
K.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|