The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Blind automation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: Tivo 199 at Powerhouse?


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: Tivo 199 at Powerhouse?
  • From: "Kenneth Watt" <kennwatt@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 11:29:40 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Having one I can understand why a second or even a third would be a good
idea ;-)

Eastenders is not *my* cup of tea, but someone else around here keeps
recording hours of the stuff!

K.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: PatrickLidstone [mailto:patrickl@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 31 December 2001 10:43
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Tivo 199 at Powerhouse?
>
> --- In ukha_d@y..., "Mark McCall" <mark@a...> wrote:
> > Is it not 200 quid? I believe this is the "lifetime" of
the box as
> well, so when you buy a new one, upgrade etc you will need a new sub.
> >
>
> You're right, it is 199 - just checked their website. I *thought* I
> paid 100 about 14 months ago, strange.
>
> The sub is tied to the box, but survives upgrades to that box. In the
> US they do a cheap second-sub option (it's not uncommon for people
> have two or more to "resolve conflicts". Boggle.)
>
> Patrick
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>





Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.