[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: BT or NTL
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: BT or NTL
- From: "Brian G. Reynolds" <brian.g.reynolds@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:54:22 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<snip>
"Apart from the Caller-ID issue, I've no cause for complaint so far...
The
engineers even left me an NTL hat!!"
Wait, it will happen.................
Why no CID? just because you might be paying for it don't mean it is
activated! ask me how I know......
B.
>From: "Ian Davidson" <ian@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>To: "HA Yahoo group UK" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: [ukha_d] BT or NTL
>Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:39:08 -0000
>
>Hi All
>
>A couple of weeks ago I rang NTL and asked if they could provide cable
to
>the new house. They didn't know as neither the address or postcode were
yet
>on there system.
>
>Out the blue NTL rang me today and said yes they could install. SO the
big
>question is Do I go for BT and ADSL or NTL and cable. Your views on
costs
>and performance ?
>
>I use a couple of webserver at home (1 for HA) and stream video and
audio
>(security). I think the ADSL upstream is a wider bandwidth than NTL's
cable
>but not sure if NTL offer different packages ?
>
>( I already know some of your views on both companies, even just
checking
>today's messages ! )
>
>Ian D
_________________________________________________________________
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|