[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: RE: OT: This is where UKHA'ers are located
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: RE: OT: This is where UKHA'ers are located
- From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:37:19 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Now here's a maverick idea for the map....
We have dots, whose size is an indication of the number of HAers in that
post code.
What if we could use colour as an indication of "number of HAers
divided
by actual population", with RED areas being HA-dense areas, YELLOW
being
HA-light.
As such:
- Big Red Dot, lots of HAers, even taking into account how many people
live there
- Big Yellow Dot, lots of HAers, but this is a very highly populated
area anyway
- Small Red Dot, not many HAers, but not many people live there, so it's
actually a HA hotspot
- Small Yellow Dot, not many HAers, even taking into account how few
people live there.
Does this make sense? Are, in fact, the postcodes all of roughly equal
populations anyway??
Mark Harrison
Head of Systems, eKingfisher
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|