|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: RE: [OT] Baby monitor picking up "hum" |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Combining X10 powerline interfaces
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Combining X10 powerline interfaces
- From: "Kevin Hawkins" <lists@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 18:43:29 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
So..
the outcome.
I have a problem with the way Homeseer works with the
RCS
TX-15B thermostats - see adjacent thread. This uses pre set dim commands
which I
think are getting mangled on receipt. What PLI interface should I use that
I can
connect between HomeVision / Ocelot and mains to correct this situation. I
know
the TW7223 a? and the TW523 are not working. Should I get the 7223B or
the
XM10U (from yourself of course Li) ! I really want HV etc to be able to
receive the widest range of X10
commands.
Kevin
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Kevin Hawkins
wrote:
> I understood that basically the
power line interfaces were akin to a > modem in that they detected
the
presence of a single tone (120Khz) and could > also superimpose this
tone back on the power line upon request. In addition > they reported
the zero crossing points to allow you to time the insertion of > the
X10
carrier correctly.
You got it. The important thing to remember is
that
there is no decoding involved, apart from modulating/demodulating the
120KHz signal and recognising that it is an X-10 signal. All X-10
transmissions starts with the start code of 1110 in binary. The TW523
only
recognises standard pairs of 11-bit X-10 commands with 3 power line
cycle
gaps between each pair.
> Li - any
comments
on the ON/OFF v just dimming LED operation of these > things (see top
post in thread) , could this be caused perhaps by the
The LED on the
interface gives a visual indication that X-10 codes are being received.
The
LED lights up when AC power is applied and blinks off when X-10 codes
are
received. The interface is also capable of receiving the codes that it
transmits, therefore the LED will also provide an indication of codes
being
transmitted.
On some of the original TW523 and the converted unit,
the
capacitive power supply is struggling to provide adequate current to
drive
the circuit and the red LED at the same time. The dimming of the LED is
sometimes a visual indication of the problem. Removing the current drain
by
removing the LED would overcome the problem.
> carrier being
inserted abnormally late in the cycle rather than just after > zero
crossing and also there were some interfaces that didn't handle all
the > fancy X10 formats (extended, enhanced etc) I had an idea this
was
the the > XM10U or is that basically dumb too ? - it may have been
the
CM11 I am > thinking of...
X-10 Europe has confused the market
by
introducing versions of the interface that work slightly differently to
the
original TW523.
The TW523 is capable of passing along one of the two
copies of received X-10 commands (X-10 commands are usually transmitted
twice) and it is capable of sending but not receiving the (old) extended
code/data. Every other Bright and Dim commands are passed along also but
not every one.
The TW7223 (a) is an European version of the same
unit.
Internally, it has been completely redesigned but functionally it is
identical to the TW523.
The TW7223 (b) is similar to (a) except that
X-10 has changed the MCU inside the unit and rewritten the firmware. It
is
capable of passing both copies of every X-10 command received and is
capable of sending and receiving the extended commands. Unfortunately,
the
unannounced change caused chaos as almost all the 3rd party home
automation
controllers (eg. HomeVision, Comfort) on the market at the time were
expecting the original TW523 behaviour of passing one command out of the
two sent. Updated firmware was needed to overcome the
problem.
The
XM10U might have been functionally similar to the TW7223 (b) for a while
before X-10 changed the firmware to revert the behaviour back to
the TW523
way. I have lost track of the changes.
Regards,
Kwong
Li li@xxxxxxxLaser Business Systems Ltd. http://www.laser.com
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|