The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: OT:Pictures of new motor with friends


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RF interference



Hi Tony,

Start with the attenuator on the output of the last device before the
distribution amp and work backwards. If you have an OnDodgy box it should be
the FIRST thing in the chain to ensure the best quality digital signals
reach it.

Regarding the websites....
I tried both the main ones when you mentioned it and they both worked. Both
are redirected to the same BTInternet website. The TabooTV site is on a free
ASP hosting service in the states and is sometimes really flakey.

I think there may be some DNS problems somewhere as I have been getting
loads of failures on all kinds of sites over the last 2 days :-(

Keith

www.diyha.co.uk
www.kat5.tv


-----Original Message-----
From: BUTLER, Tony, FM [mailto:tony.butler@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 04 July 2002 08:08
To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RF interference


Hi Keith,

I was hoping you'd spot my thread :-)

> You can get plug in attenuators that cut the RF level by 6dB
> or 12dB. I have
> had to use some of these before my RF distribution amp otherwise some
> channels suffer strange artifacts.

That's what I was talking about - I suspect this is the problem, but I don't
know
a) what attenuator to get (I think I have a 6dB one lying around somewhere)
and b) where to put it in the circuit:
- On the Aerial in to the first device?
- Mid way down the chain?
- Just before the Tivo input?
- Just before the it goes into the TV?
- Or indeed should I have one on the input to each device?

> As a first step (ie Zero cost) I would suggest plotting your
> channels on the
> Taboo TV guide.

I tried that last nite and kat5.tv was dead.
Today, kat5.tv is alive, but taboo tv is dead :(

> If that fails you need to try attenuation at various points
> in the RF chain
> to find the optimum place to cut the level.

Oh, should have read all your email b4 replying.  Ignore my q's above unless
you have an idea where the best place is to place the attenuator/ multiple
attenuators....

> The best way is with proper measuring equipment but that cost
> loadsamoney
> :-(

Doesn't everything :-[


cheers,


Tony


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
{short
description of image}

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.