|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: RE: OT:Pictures of new motor with friends |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: RF interference
Hi Tony,
Start with the attenuator on the output of the last device before the
distribution amp and work backwards. If you have an OnDodgy box it should
be
the FIRST thing in the chain to ensure the best quality digital signals
reach it.
Regarding the websites....
I tried both the main ones when you mentioned it and they both worked.
Both
are redirected to the same BTInternet website. The TabooTV site is on a
free
ASP hosting service in the states and is sometimes really flakey.
I think there may be some DNS problems somewhere as I have been getting
loads of failures on all kinds of sites over the last 2 days :-(
Keith
www.diyha.co.uk
www.kat5.tv
-----Original Message-----
From: BUTLER, Tony, FM [mailto:tony.butler@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 04 July 2002 08:08
To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RF interference
Hi Keith,
I was hoping you'd spot my thread :-)
> You can get plug in attenuators that cut the RF level by 6dB
> or 12dB. I have
> had to use some of these before my RF distribution amp otherwise
some
> channels suffer strange artifacts.
That's what I was talking about - I suspect this is the problem, but I
don't
know
a) what attenuator to get (I think I have a 6dB one lying around
somewhere)
and b) where to put it in the circuit:
- On the Aerial in to the first device?
- Mid way down the chain?
- Just before the Tivo input?
- Just before the it goes into the TV?
- Or indeed should I have one on the input to each device?
> As a first step (ie Zero cost) I would suggest plotting your
> channels on the
> Taboo TV guide.
I tried that last nite and kat5.tv was dead.
Today, kat5.tv is alive, but taboo tv is dead :(
> If that fails you need to try attenuation at various points
> in the RF chain
> to find the optimum place to cut the level.
Oh, should have read all your email b4 replying. Ignore my q's above
unless
you have an idea where the best place is to place the attenuator/
multiple
attenuators....
> The best way is with proper measuring equipment but that cost
> loadsamoney
> :-(
Doesn't everything :-[
cheers,
Tony
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|