|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: RE: Programming E2k |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: A Question about X10.
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: A Question about X10.
- From: "Marcus Warrington" <marcusw@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 15:46:05 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Doogie Brodie wrote ;
> There is the kludge of mounting an LD11 somewhere else (eg ceiling
rose)
> and mucking around with the wiring a bit between the switch and
the
> rose..... Ken Watt described that a while ago, which I was going to
do
> until I discovered I had upside down lighting.... my ring was wired
with
> the neutrals at the switch end, not at the rose end.......
I've just finished having the house rewired.. and just as the
electrician
finishes I "discover" x10. Non of my light switches have
neutrals.. they all
switch on the live (which I'm told is the norm?), so I'd assumed I was
stuck,
but are you saying I could actually have a way around this. Would the
switch
need replacing with a momentary type, or can it still be a rocker. Do
the
LD11's support dimming are are they simply on/off. Can they be used
with
the "modern" energy saving bulbs ?
Having said all that, I sort of get the impression that x10 isn't the
panacia I initially thought it was. Am I correct in assuming that there
can be significant delays and interferance ?
marcusw@xxxxxxx "Marcus Warrington"
MIS Computer Services (UK)
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|