|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: UK HA All-encompasing FAQ |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: PIR Options
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: PIR Options
- From: "Amar Nagi" <amar@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:08:28 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
how are you guys interface your PIRs to X10 ? or X10 controller ? or
Computer ?
-----Original Message-----
From: psghome2002 [mailto:psghome@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thu 18/07/2002 12:00
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ukha_d]PIR Options
The new PIR sounds interesting - I would
imagine it's being designed
to address the 'occupancy sensing'
issue???
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Frank Mc
Alinden" <armagh@b...> wrote:
> Hi All
>
I have used many different pir sensors over the years
as i
> worked on and off in the security
industry . My personal first
choice is
> Pulnix sensors and secondly and also
IMO a great detector is the
Alarmcon
> 210 sensor and 220 these are now
outdated i think the new ones are
called
> 310 + 320 etc but i used lots of
them in large commercial stores
here in
> Melbourne . Also i was speaking via
email to the President of
Pulnix America
> ( a Scot) and he said that they were
developing a pir for the HA
market he
> wouldnt elaborate but will let me know
when its ready. If your
interested i
> have a couple of pics on my site
and a link to pulnix sensors. I
also
> purchase my cctv stuff from them.
www.users.bigpond.com/armagh/
>
> Frank Mc
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "psghome2002"
<psghome@h...>
> To: <ukha_d@y...>
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:22
PM
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d]PIR Options
>
>
> > I trialled a few different PIR's
for the same use (there's been a
> > lot of discussion about this on
here before). I wanted
the 'perfect
> > PIR' that had to meet the
following criteria:
> >
> > 1) Quick triggering
> > 2) Stable so as not to give false
alarms when used as security
PIR
> > 3) Looks good
> > 4) Ability to turn On/Off LED
> > 5) Interchangeable Lens for
wide/curtain mode detection.
> >
> > Point 1 is normally part dealt
with by user selectable 'pulse
count'
> > i.e. how many detection pattern
'beams' need to be broken to
trigger
> > and the internal logic used by the
detector (and how quick it
is).
> > Generally it is best to go for a
sensor that allows a pulse
count of
> > between 1 and 4, although most
will start at 2 for stability (low
> > false-alarm) reasons.
> >
> > I must say that I have still not
found the ideal sensor - I have
a
> > combination of:
> >
> > Alarmcom IR120C - look really
good, use great 'black mirror'
> > technology (cutting down
susceptibility to sunlight and other
> > unwanted radiation) and are very
stable but a little slow to
trigger
> > + they are fairly cheap trade.
> >
> > Pyronix Magnum Ultra - (existing
PIR's in my house) - OKish
looking,
> > seem quite stable and have
selectable 1/2/3 pulse count making
it a
> > bit quicker to trigger when on
1.
> >
> > Optex RX-40QZ - Recommended by
Comfort but I've not tried this
yet -
> > only 2/4 pulse count and detection
area doesn't look very dense.
> >
> > I think the detection area density
is also important. This is the
> > pattern of 'detection beams' that
spread out from the sensor and
how
> > closely they are spaced. The lower
the density, the further you
will
> > have to move to trigger the sensor
(depending on pulse count).
This
> > is especially important if you
want to detect occupancy in, say,
the
> > living room where you may sit on a
sofa for longish periods of
time.
> > A high-density pattern and propper
alignment of the PIR will help
> > here although you cannot guarantee
that the sensor will pick up
> > small movements.
> >
> > Someone mentioned a dual tech
sensor on here a while ago.
Generally
> > these are no good as their trigger
time is pretty poor (long).
They
> > use a combination of IR detection
and microwaves. This particular
> > sensor gave separate outputs for
both sensors, allowing the
> > (quicker) microwave technology to
be used on it's own. The
microwave
> > bit can be difficult as it will
apparently sense through walls
> > (although I've not tried one) - so
siteing is important. Anyone
use
> > these - I'd love to hear if it's
successful.
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> > --- In ukha_d@y..., "Amar
Nagi" <amar@a...> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have homeseer, ocelot and I
want to set up sensors around my
> > flat to
> > > indicate when a room is
occupied. What are my options ? I get
a bit
> > > confused
> > > by the range of different
sensors (Pir)
> > >
> > > Any recommend anything ? I
don't really want to go for the RF
x10
> > route
> > >
> > > Ps sorry I used the wrong
subject line b4.
> >
> >
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ps3dMC/R_ZEAA/Ey.GAA/IBOolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
<<winmail.dat>>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|