Re: Re: The Solution to Room Occupation Detection

["Simon Coates" <ecolume@xxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: Ian Lowe <ian@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: 10 June 2002 14:29
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: The Solution to Room Occupation Detection


> If the tagging method provided (in combination with the other systems)
a
> 100% reliable detection schema, which could tell who (of the house
> occupants) was where and when, I think it would be worth it!

Tha extension of this would be a smart security alarm system.  With
a
combination of PIR detectors and embeded chips the alarm could detect
that
there was someone in the room and verify that it's a family member -
otherwise it's an intruder.  This would allow you to have the alarm
active
24 hours.  Obviously have to issue guests with a tag or something!

Just thinking!


Simon


>
> as for WAF... you could always bribe the dentist. :D
>
> or, alternatively, for you family guys: you pitch it as a child
safety
> thing: you would tag a dog to ensure it's safe return, why not a
child..
and
> if the kids are getting it, wifey is just as important to you as
the
> kids...... et voila ;)
>
> Ian.
>
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>



For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.