|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: New Poll |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: Demon Email
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: Demon Email
- From: "Ian Lowe" <ian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:04:07 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Paul, if you can surf the net, and have never set up Proxy Server, then
you
need to go here:
https://grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2
and do a port scan. it's possible you have more problems than an open
SMTP
relay.
The main thing you get from a proxy server, or NAT firewall, is IP
hiding:
an entire network can hide behind a single IP address, rather than every
PC
having to have a "real" internet address.
Proxy Servers are (IMO) a complete waste of time. NAT based firewalls
with
stateful inspection, such as Firewall-1 or the super cheep Winroute
provide
better access (almost 100% transparent to the user) without as many
overheads.
Ian.
-----Original Message-----
From: paul_watkin [mailto:paul_watkin@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 13 June 2002 16:20
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Demon Email
I can see the benefit from the caching perspective but am lost as to
it's benefit in the context of enabling browsing the web and using
Outlook etc, after all I can browse the web on my network now and I
don't have a proxy server running (Or do I??).
Is a proxy server necessary in order to use Exchange?
Or am I missing something?
Paul
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|