RE: Anyone seen the Panny LCD TVs in the flesh

["Phil Harris" <phil@xxxxxxx>]

> > The Panasonic maybe isn't worth =A31,200 to *YOU* ...
>=20
> Read what I wrote ... "and that is why *I* wouldn't buy
it".=20
> *I*. Not you, not Tim, but me.

OK ... So why are you telling the rest of us it's not worth the money?

> Did I say that? Why do you have to make everything so confrontational?

I didn't think I was being confrontational ...

> You have a way of my twisting words and presenting them in a=20
> way that is far from the truth.

Really? Cool! I'll add that to my CV...
=20
> Once again you seem to think that once you have a certain=20
> amount of money then gained value for money from something no=20
> long applies.

Not at all ... But your perceptions of what value for money is can
change quite drastically.

> All I was doing was offering an opinion, a different point of=20
> view. Did I say Tim shouldn't buy one? No, I just offerred by=20
> opinion and highlighted a possible option where you could=20
> spend less money and get a better system. From your=20
> responses, I now wish I hadn't bothered trying to help.

OK ... Last time we "locked horns" I tried to back down and just
let it
go but still got shot at by you for doing so. We don't bicker on this
group and I don't think anyone else has ever said that I'm
confrontational. Last time you said that you were having a bad day ...
Seems like you have a lot of bad days!

Phil


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk=20
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx=20
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx=20
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20