The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: DOMAINS/Computer Names ( was...: Average Computing Devices\Person Ratio in UKHA households)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT] Widescreen ....was ( Anyone seen the Panny LCD TVs in the flesh)


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [OT] Widescreen ....was ( Anyone seen the Panny LCD TVs in the flesh)
  • From: "Keith Doxey" <lists.diyha@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:50:57 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Title: Message
Interesting words......
 
interesting in that you shell out loads of dosh for a 16:9 screen to avoid the black bars and then get DVD's that are wider than 16:9 so you still get black bars :-(
 
I got conned with the BoxSet of "Back To The Future". It is a letterbox format. Sometime later I read that the films were shot as 4:3 with only certain scenes in 16:9. Last time it was on BBC1 I did a comparison, after all the whole arguement FOR widescreen was to see the bits that were chopped off the sides of the 4:3 picture.
 
Sky Digital was showing a 16:9 broadcast
BBC1 Terrestrial was showing a FullScreen 4:3 image
 
As I "knew" the film wasnt really Widescreen I was intrigued.....
 
Standing where I could see 2 TV's I did a comparison. The edges of the pictures were identical so I studied the top and bottom of the picture.
 
4:3 picture - I could see Dr. Emmet Brown's entire head
16:9 picture - cut off halfway up his forehead
 
They had cropped a 4:3 picture to 16:9 and were giving you LESS picture when the sales pitch for W/S sets is that you get MORE picture.
 
All my TV's are still 4:3 at the moment.
 
I am used to a 28" TV. To get the same HEIGHT of picture on a 16:9 set would require a 36" WS which is too much money at the moment although they are dropping quite quickly. Anything less than 36" WS would be a SHORTSCREEN set as the picture would not be as tall as the one I currently watch.
 
BTW. I havent seen the Panny
 
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Morris [mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 11 March 2002 14:24
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: RE: [ukha_d] Anyone seen the Panny LCD TVs in the flesh

Two words. Aspect Ratio.

 

Tim

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerard McGovern [mailto:stuff@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 11 March 2002 14:11
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: RE: [ukha_d] Anyone seen the Panny LCD TVs in the flesh

 

But they are so expensive. Why not get a 15inch LCD computer monitor, buy a tuner and then buy a SCART to VGA adapter?

 

 

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.