The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: CAT5 vs. Wired


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wireless iPaq was WAP11


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Wireless iPaq was WAP11
  • From: "jtankard" <john@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:56:26 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

> > > BTW, I LOVE wireless (great in laptops)....  and will be
> > > getting cards for my ePODS and Fujis.  I don't see it as a
> > > replacement for CAT5, but as a supplement for mobile devices
> > > and areas that are hard/impossible to cable.
> > >
> >
> > I agree, it transforms what you can do. Normally I have outlook
on my
> > workstation, but I have lent it to a customer so I now have
> > moved it to
> > my laptop, I love the freedom. I can also wireless sync my
> > ipaq with my
> > wireless laptop, now that is cool !
>
> You sure you're not just cheating and using IR on the laptop to
sync? :-)

I have never tried that, I get a lot of emails and I avant-go loads
of web sites, I assumed it would be too slow, I might give it a go.

>
> It is cool - I no longer need that stupid docking cradle with the
iPaq
> wobbling in it because it's too heavy with the CF card adapter
attached so
> it bends back and loses the connection all the time :(
>

I am going to order a simple sync lead as I have the same problem if
I have the PC back on

John



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.