The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: XDA II or shall I keep my ipaq?


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OT Raid Setup for MP3 Server


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: OT Raid Setup for MP3 Server
  • From: "graham_howe" <graham@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:28:30 -0000
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Forgive me for hijacking this thread for personal use, but I have a
question about raid 5 so I thought I'd add it here rather than start
a new topic.

I have recently rebuilt my server with a raid 5 contoller and 3 hot
swap drives. The drives are 2 x 80 and 1 x 60 so my logical disk is
140Gb. With disk prices falling quite dramatically, I thought that I
would take the opportunity to upgrade, but I don't want to completely
rebuild the server.

My understanding is that if I simply remove one disk and replace it
with another, then the system will automatically 'sync' the new disk
so that everything is hunky dorey again. If that is the case, then
can I simply replace one disk at a time (allowing time for 'sync')
until I achieve my desired configuration.

A few points concern me, first is it OK for a disk to be replaced
with a larger one. Second, is it possible to add additional disks to
the array (although they will have to be fixed as I have no more 5.25
bays for hot swap caddies) without rebuilding.

Regards

Graham


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.