The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: 20 Bay 4U case unRAID build


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Network attached storage


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Network attached storage
  • From: Steve B <steve@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:46:39 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Why not e-smith. You would get all the other services but you need not use
them. Answer a few questions and its up. remove keyboard & screen. Admin by web

At 09:58 17/05/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>For a while now I've been toying with the idea of having a Network
>Attached Storage box hidden away somewhere on my LAN- to protect my data
>should anything happen to my main pc.  I've had servers in the past, but
>the hassle of having them on 24/7 or turning them on so I can get at my
>data has always been too much.
>
>I've purchased a cyrix 180mhz set-top box machine from ebay for £21 (came
>with a 3.2 gig samsung that I then sold on ebay for £24!!!) and popped a
>10 gig drive (just experimental) in it.
>
>I've tried several configurations for this machine, all of which I'm not
>overly happy with.  My latest experiment is windows 98 lite to serve my
>lan, but I want a more elegant solution than that.
>
>Before that I was using Red Hat 7.2 and Samba - but whenever I had to do
>any configuration on it I ended up having to run X which ran like a
>dog.  Even though it was a lower power machine - a 10 meg mp3 file copied
>accross my lan in about 2 seconds - enough for me.
>
>What I would like is a light weight linux distro that just had samba and
>swat (web administration of samba) Idealy a web linux admin tool on it as
>well, so it really performed just like the commercial NAS storage like the
>snapservers.  I'm sure that linux MUST be the best way of doing this - but
>I'm completely out of my depth with it.   And I just want the samba stuff
>- without all the other linux stuff to confuse myself with.
>
>Can anyone point me in a direction of a linux distro that just does NAS?
>
>Ta!
>
>Matthew
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>ADVERTISEMENT
><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=178320.2057063.3524709.1829184/D=egroupweb/S=1705041992:HM/A=979989/R=0/*http://www.fastweb.com/ib/yahoo-79f>4aaaff5.jpg
>
>4aab0ab.jpg
>
>For more information:
><http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx >Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx >Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx >List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx >
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
><http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Steve.

http://www.bov.nu

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

JPEG
image

JPEG
image


Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.