|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: RE: Bulk Buy, anyone? |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: List Fragmenting was UKHA Meeting 2003, an Update
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: List Fragmenting was UKHA Meeting 2003, an
Update
- From: "Phillip Harris" <phil@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 16:26:27 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> That's what I do (only my message goes to my xAP folder:-),
> but not all users have Outlook 2000 or Outlook 2002. And as
> happens people often don't select a good subject line, take
> [OT] becomes ot, and often there is no OT.
Yup ... I see exactly what you mean ...
... Problem is that the "vocal ones" about the number of posts
only
really seem to want to see what they're interested in and I reckon
there
are a lot of bloody interesting posts being missed because of all the
fragmentation now. I've seen plenty of the people complaining about the
quantity of OT stuff adding their own OT contributions over time but
because it was stuff *they* wanted to post then it was OK.
For example I would like to occasionally dip into the xAP talk and
listen in just to see what's happening but not all the time.
Notice though that UKHA_Off_Topic (or whatever it is) has *5*
subscribers?
Phil
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|