The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: [OT] HELP!! EastEnders from Friday night


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Slightly OT SliMP3 disk spanning in w2k Server


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Slightly OT SliMP3 disk spanning in w2k Server
  • From: "Dr John Tankard" <john@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:11:30 -0000
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Sorry if this is a repost, I cannot see my original message.

Ok I have a MP3 archive which will not fit on one physical drive, my
server is a w2k server box with 6 drives one of which is a removable
icydock, I have two physical disks with my archive on them, one is
mounted inside by 4U server the other is in the icydock, I need to
be able to swap out part of my archive rather than the other disks
because the others are full of work stuff, and I often get customers
w2k server disks which I have to mount to do work on.

SliMP3 requires all the mp3's to be off one directory. I can think
of two ways to do this both using w2k servers dynamic disk feature

1) span a drive letter over the two disks
2) mount the removable drive into the file system of the fixed disk.

Question is normaly dynamic disks would never be removed, what will
w2k server do if if remove the disk in either of the above
situations ?

John


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.