> Farscape discs are good for the same reason [Claudia Black this time
:D]
> and are extremely good quality transfers.
Pah - Andromeda - Lexa Doig.
No contest.
M.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Watt [mailto:kwatt@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 11 October 2002 11:00
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Do you really need a projector screen? - NO -
Paint code
> Yeah, it did get close as a starter. As we've discussed
before,
> different
> discs give different results - I hoped, given your vast
experience,
that
> you
> might say "after the optimiser, use this this and this disc to
adjust
the
> piccie further to get an image that looks good on 90% of discs....
:/
The ones I use are The Matrix (obviously) as there are lots of dark
scenes in it with reflective surfaces [like Carrie-Ann Moss's ass in
leather! ;)] as well as some very well lit scenes.
Farscape discs are good for the same reason [Claudia Black this time
:D]
and are extremely good quality transfers.
T2, need I say more!
The Shawshank Redemption and Green Mile are also good.
ST: Insurrection is good for showing up flaws, therefore good for
getting the picture as good as it can be, shit disc transfer though and
not too hot a film to sit through. :/
Phil can prolly come up with more selections.
> It's not just the piccie quality, it's the quality of the
programming
:-(
> These days, E4 gets most of my viewing.....
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use
this contact form
. Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control
over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed
to the relevant mailing list.