RE: FW: KKJA038CA EASYSHARE DX3600

["Gerard McGovern" <stuff@xxxxxxx>]

> > However, the reason why everyone involved with the original,
famous 
> > Kodak screw up was because they advertised it as a 'special
offer'. 
> > Once they did that, Kodak lost any leg they had to stand on.
> 
> The TV from Dixons was not advertised as a special.  They had
> very clear T&C that gave them an easy get out.  Yet they 
> still delivered my a TV worth over 400 quid for 179.00.

>From the sounds of it, that was a gesture of goodwill on Dixons part
in
order to save face. I haven't seen the Dixon's T&Cs but that may
not
have necessarily get them off the hook. You can't have unlawful or
unjust T&Cs.

The Kodak example was more important financially as 10,000 people
ordered the cameras whereas I'd imagine but even 1% of that figure
ordered the Dixons TV.

G

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.