The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Re: Electrisave protocol / PC Interface


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rapidhoster !



----- Original Message -----
From: "Rowdy" <aoop43@xxxxxxx>
>
> Anyone with similar problems or any advice.

Just one, and without any digs at the various people offering hosting
services on the list...

Make a judgement call on the value of your hosting, and just how much you
need that site up.

If it's your main email address, and you really need it to be available
reliably, then let's face it: if someone is only making ten quid a year,
exactly how much resilience or techncial support effort do you want or
expect for that sort of cash?

I mean, seriously, chalk out the bandwidth charges and rackspace, and if
someone working on McDonalds Counter Staff wages works on your problem for
half an hour over the whole year, the supplier is making a loss. The entire
business model is absoutely dependant on not having to do much support.

Our company provides hosting services, we charge about fifteen times what
rapidhoster do, and even then, we only offer it to our support customers as
a value add - I wouldn't dream of selling hosting services for any less
than
a couple of hundred a year to have any realistic chance of making a profit
and providing the level of support that I would happy with.

If you want something reliable, check the reviews here:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/
and see what people say about what a hoster
does when things go wrong.

Ultimately, If you decide that bargain basement hosting is good enough, go
for it, but be realistic in your expectations of what you are buying.

Ian.



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.